The engineering.
The business.
The connection between them.
I'm an independent Salesforce consultant with technical and engineering depth, management experience, and business judgment. I can work in the details without losing sight of what the business is trying to accomplish.
Find the real problem.
Then connect the solution.
A technical symptom is not always the real problem. A difficult release may point to architecture. Rework may point to the requirement. A project that drifts may need a better way to make and evaluate decisions.
I learn how the business works, connect the technical choices to real objectives, and make the tradeoffs clear. That is what speaking both languages means in practice.
It also lets me close the information gap between a client and the people they hire. You need enough independent expertise on your side to question the proposal, judge the work, and understand what you are taking on.
Proven practices,
adapted for AI.
I've studied and designed the machinery that connects established software development practices to agent-driven work: Salesforce base packages, GitHub Actions, agent skills and prompts, and the processes around them.
The goal is an ecosystem where architecture, coding practice, quality control, change management, and CI/CD reinforce each other. A system that makes delivery understandable, rather than a black box.
AI changes who can create software and how quickly they can do it. I take that shift seriously, without treating the tools as infallible. My clients see the power and want the engineering judgment, supervision, and governance to use it responsibly.
The fundamentals aren't outdated.
They're what make the new tools usable.